I'm not familiar with any of these websites, so I can't tell if the hackers are targeting just real abuse or all zoo content.
AliasTheReindeerPoneShort Christmas Horse 6 points on 2015-04-19 19:17:35
That's the interesting thing to me; the sites they're targeting don't seem to be the highly recognized ones, which could mean a few of things.
On one hand, perhaps it's meant as a warning; "If you don't do ___, we'll start hitting bigger sites." But if they want to play mind games, then I have to think taking down a larger site would leave a larger impact. Plus, as it stands, they don't seem to be making any specific or measurable demands.
So a second option arises; perhaps they really are only going after strictly abusive content. I'm not familiar with the affected sites either, and if anyone could weigh in on them, I'm curious about what manner of content was offered there.
Thirdly, and this is something to keep in mind with many cases of aggression; maybe they're just not that good at what they do. A majority of the zoophilia related sites I've visited (Before shaking my head and leaving on account of the discussion to porn ratio) look like they were designed in the early 1600s by a parrot and rock. Zoo pages on Facebook and reddit may prove challenging, but for someone with experience, I can't imagine that many zoo specific sites would be difficult to break.
zoozooz 3 points on 2015-04-19 21:57:42
So a second option arises; perhaps they really are only going after strictly abusive content.
If you can find any reasonable thought anywhere there, let us know.
AliasTheReindeerPoneShort Christmas Horse 2 points on 2015-04-19 22:08:10
Hm, I see. I hadn't heard much about any of this, and was basing everything on this post alone. My mistake, thanks for the insight.
It's clear to see that possibility two is out, as well as part of my reasoning for possibility one. I suppose that leaves number three.
duskwuff 2 points on 2015-04-19 23:35:55
What on earth is their list of "additional targets" even supposed to be? Random pages on Danish websites?
Also, that paste's dated June 9th 2014. Surprisingly old.
zoozooz 1 point on 2015-04-20 00:36:37
I have no idea what they think they are doing.
zootrashcandoggy doodle dandy 1 point on 2015-04-20 06:14:02
I'm particularly amused by the inclusion of antique-toys.dk on their target list.
HeartBeatOfTheBeastHoof and Claw 4 points on 2015-04-19 22:21:22
The sites just look like they were link farms that hosted no actual content, hence why no one is familiar with the sites.
HeartBeatOfTheBeastHoof and Claw 2 points on 2015-04-19 19:18:33
It appears most of the sites were not English languge ones since many have the word "zoofilia" in the domain. It would not surprise me if many of the hacked websites had the same owner.
Tundrovyy-VolkCanidae 9 points on 2015-04-19 20:47:48
The illiterate /b/tards have tried to DDoS bestiality sites in the past. It didn't last before, so I doubt it will last this time.
actuallynotazoophileok, I lied 9 points on 2015-04-20 01:06:48
As a zoophile, I support the removal of websites promoting animal abuse.
doncox9 3 points on 2015-04-20 05:46:37
Intolerance is evil. Free speech must prevail. The consequences are dire. We must all be free to express ourselves, even if such expression offends others. We must all be free in our beliefs and expression unless it involves forcible silence of others.
/r/zoophilia archive
I'm not familiar with any of these websites, so I can't tell if the hackers are targeting just real abuse or all zoo content.
That's the interesting thing to me; the sites they're targeting don't seem to be the highly recognized ones, which could mean a few of things.
On one hand, perhaps it's meant as a warning; "If you don't do ___, we'll start hitting bigger sites." But if they want to play mind games, then I have to think taking down a larger site would leave a larger impact. Plus, as it stands, they don't seem to be making any specific or measurable demands.
So a second option arises; perhaps they really are only going after strictly abusive content. I'm not familiar with the affected sites either, and if anyone could weigh in on them, I'm curious about what manner of content was offered there.
Thirdly, and this is something to keep in mind with many cases of aggression; maybe they're just not that good at what they do. A majority of the zoophilia related sites I've visited (Before shaking my head and leaving on account of the discussion to porn ratio) look like they were designed in the early 1600s by a parrot and rock. Zoo pages on Facebook and reddit may prove challenging, but for someone with experience, I can't imagine that many zoo specific sites would be difficult to break.
Haha, You don't really believe that, do you?
This is the kind of stuff they have been spreading: http://pastebin.com/XQs0Rcsq
One of the websites they are attacking is wetgodess.net. Do you see anyone here giving any reason to why they think they need to do that? https://twitter.com/search?q=wetgoddess.net%2F&src=typd&vertical=default&f=tweets
Their campaign is now named #OpBeast: https://twitter.com/search?q=opbeast&src=typd&vertical=default&f=tweets
But not everyone got the memo and some are still using #OpNullDenmark: https://twitter.com/search?q=opnulldenmark&src=typd&vertical=default&f=tweets
If you can find any reasonable thought anywhere there, let us know.
Hm, I see. I hadn't heard much about any of this, and was basing everything on this post alone. My mistake, thanks for the insight.
It's clear to see that possibility two is out, as well as part of my reasoning for possibility one. I suppose that leaves number three.
What on earth is their list of "additional targets" even supposed to be? Random pages on Danish websites?
Also, that paste's dated June 9th 2014. Surprisingly old.
I have no idea what they think they are doing.
I'm particularly amused by the inclusion of antique-toys.dk on their target list.
The sites just look like they were link farms that hosted no actual content, hence why no one is familiar with the sites.
It appears most of the sites were not English languge ones since many have the word "zoofilia" in the domain. It would not surprise me if many of the hacked websites had the same owner.
The illiterate /b/tards have tried to DDoS bestiality sites in the past. It didn't last before, so I doubt it will last this time.
As a zoophile, I support the removal of websites promoting animal abuse.
Intolerance is evil. Free speech must prevail. The consequences are dire. We must all be free to express ourselves, even if such expression offends others. We must all be free in our beliefs and expression unless it involves forcible silence of others.