Particularly the 91-75 yes to no vote... isn't it interested how many nos there are that you never heard about....
furvert_tailEquine, large canid 2 points on 2015-04-22 17:07:42
Mmm. Very interesting.
JonasCliverMightyenas lol 1 point on 2015-04-25 14:25:53
We can't prove harm, so we must assume harm without proof
Yearningmice 1 point on 2015-04-25 14:49:25
Which is interesting when we reflect on how we "use" animals in other ways, don't you think? For meat, entertainment, in captivity because we know what's best. Often we can prove the harm being caused, but it's "humane" or "For their own good".
/r/zoophilia archive
Particularly the 91-75 yes to no vote... isn't it interested how many nos there are that you never heard about....
Mmm. Very interesting.
Which is interesting when we reflect on how we "use" animals in other ways, don't you think? For meat, entertainment, in captivity because we know what's best. Often we can prove the harm being caused, but it's "humane" or "For their own good".