CaristinnCaptain Esports 4 points on 2015-06-25 07:49:59
Caveats are included for "animal husbandry practices, conformation judging practices, or accepted veterinary medical practices."
"Yeah, I'm going to need to get a closer look at this animal's genitals, to really make sure it's up to breeding standards... ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)"
Battlecropsdogs, cats, snakes, ungulates 4 points on 2015-06-26 03:02:58
So you can fondle a dog's balls if you're a show judge, but not on your own time at home.
wright-oneursidae canidae pantherinae 1 point on 2015-06-26 19:38:24
logic! :/
Dallas_Adoraslash 1 point on 2015-06-26 22:02:17
Who's going to find out you're fondling your dog in your own home anyway?
coyotedriftZoo Friendly 0 points on 2015-06-29 23:31:26
no one, except those idiots who make porn. The porn is the reason zoophila is so fucked in society.
Rannoch2002Deer Zoo 1 point on 2015-06-30 07:04:50
Except that ironically, if they watched some porn they'd probably see that consent IS possible...
coyotedriftZoo Friendly 0 points on 2015-06-30 17:33:38
Im going to disagree with you, most of the easily accessible ie "commercial" porn looks largely abusive. like the animals are disinterested at best. some look drugged.
Even amateur porn looks abusive to me. Some of the man on female dog stuff my roommate has shown me shows the dogs trying to pull away or at the very least not in a natural comfortable state.
It makes me uncomfortable as a "normal" to know that quite a few of you do force or pressure or manipulate your animals into sexual circumstances. Whether you believe it or not.
here is a cut and dry example. Lets say you males are topping an animal, species/gender not important, and right when you are about to pop, your lover trys to pull away. (maybe the extra swelling of your penis hurts him/her, or maybe she just had an orgasm and wants to do her "spin cycle") If you dont let him/her go so you can cum in them then you have denied them their choice and have abused your position over them.
If you want this to work out legally in the long run, your animals have to have full choice, and you have to respect it.
Now not everyone is this bad. Ive seen plenty of zoos that have animal lovers that are not interested in sex at all and they respect that. (or they say they do anyway) As they should.
Even if the actions arnt abusive and are normal behaviors for that species, the point is, is that to the general public (me) these acts LOOK abusive. and that is all the media needs.
So as I said, I think it stood a chance of acceptance if the details of your love acts remained behind closed doors. but EVERYONE that has been involved in zoo porn has virtually made sure that it will NEVER be accepted, much less legalized.
Rannoch2002Deer Zoo 1 point on 2015-07-01 00:10:57
I only have been shared 2-3 videos so I'm not an expert. You may have a point then. I guess I should have said "good porn," it just sounds like a silly thing to say...
Dallas_Adoraslash 1 point on 2015-06-30 13:14:31
Well as long as you don't make porn of it you should be fine.
Jorah_MormonismI quite enjoy pizza... 8 points on 2015-06-25 13:19:48
"Miami's most recent scandal over porn involving animals centered around a man who filmed women crushing small animals with their feet or otherwise killing the animals"
The fact that Bestiality is being grouped up together with CRUSHING SMALL ANIMALS WITH YOUR FEET, is so fucking stupid...
HeartBeatOfTheBeastHoof and Claw 1 point on 2015-06-26 00:49:15
/r/zoophilia archive
"Yeah, I'm going to need to get a closer look at this animal's genitals, to really make sure it's up to breeding standards... ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)"
So you can fondle a dog's balls if you're a show judge, but not on your own time at home.
logic! :/
Who's going to find out you're fondling your dog in your own home anyway?
no one, except those idiots who make porn. The porn is the reason zoophila is so fucked in society.
Except that ironically, if they watched some porn they'd probably see that consent IS possible...
Im going to disagree with you, most of the easily accessible ie "commercial" porn looks largely abusive. like the animals are disinterested at best. some look drugged.
Even amateur porn looks abusive to me. Some of the man on female dog stuff my roommate has shown me shows the dogs trying to pull away or at the very least not in a natural comfortable state.
It makes me uncomfortable as a "normal" to know that quite a few of you do force or pressure or manipulate your animals into sexual circumstances. Whether you believe it or not.
here is a cut and dry example. Lets say you males are topping an animal, species/gender not important, and right when you are about to pop, your lover trys to pull away. (maybe the extra swelling of your penis hurts him/her, or maybe she just had an orgasm and wants to do her "spin cycle") If you dont let him/her go so you can cum in them then you have denied them their choice and have abused your position over them.
If you want this to work out legally in the long run, your animals have to have full choice, and you have to respect it.
Now not everyone is this bad. Ive seen plenty of zoos that have animal lovers that are not interested in sex at all and they respect that. (or they say they do anyway) As they should.
Even if the actions arnt abusive and are normal behaviors for that species, the point is, is that to the general public (me) these acts LOOK abusive. and that is all the media needs.
So as I said, I think it stood a chance of acceptance if the details of your love acts remained behind closed doors. but EVERYONE that has been involved in zoo porn has virtually made sure that it will NEVER be accepted, much less legalized.
I only have been shared 2-3 videos so I'm not an expert. You may have a point then. I guess I should have said "good porn," it just sounds like a silly thing to say...
Well as long as you don't make porn of it you should be fine.
"Miami's most recent scandal over porn involving animals centered around a man who filmed women crushing small animals with their feet or otherwise killing the animals"
The fact that Bestiality is being grouped up together with CRUSHING SMALL ANIMALS WITH YOUR FEET, is so fucking stupid...
Stupid yes, but it sells newspapers.