Hell no! That's a horrible idea; Facebook is a completely inappropriate place for this type of discussion.

I couldn't think of a worse place to host a zoo group. Negligible privacy, the potential for ID theft and the use of surveillance mean it's a terrible choice for zoos.

nope

i'm scared just having clicked the link... <.< i should have logged out of facebook first before clicking on it.

If you want to talk personally, ask if you can pm someone for a talk.

I agree that Facebook is a bad idea. They are too "connected." The main mode of communication that other zoos tend to use is Skype. While yes, it has its own issues, it is not quite as connected so there is less to worry about. This would now also be a good time to mention that use of a VPN is strongly suggested since Skype does log IP addresses and it is not difficult for someone to get a hold of said IP address. I encourage you to go out and make friends, but just make sure to be safe as well.

minds.com?

Minds is an encrypted, open source social networking platform for Internet users worldwide which is backed by Anonymous and is being developed by Kramnorth Limited.

Main differences to competitors such as Facebook are the site's usage of end-to-end encryption, that it rewards people for active participation (such as voting, interacting with posts, commenting or uploading) by giving points that can be exchanged for views[ and that it doesn't rely on extracting value out of large amounts of data which can be sold to advertisement agencies but instead relies on promoted posts for advertising revenue.

When someone introduces himself into a community and his first relevant post is trying to lure persons onto a platform known to be very insecure when it comes to personal data, I really wonder what motives this person might have. I may be wrong, but it really smells like antizoo action here. IDK why anyone might think that conversations on FB are more personal, quite the opposite is true. Even your chosen name here gives clues: I am living in a relationship with my mare for nearly 23 years now, I sleep with her regularly , yet I have never in my whole life considered myself as a "horsefucker". It´s like calling a guy in a normal relationship a "womanfucker" and I sense a certain lack of respect towards zoophilia as a sexual orientation. As I said, I may be wrong, but there´s something very fishy here...so, zoos beware!

Facebook is the exact opposite of personal, therefore it would make a poor venue for one to discuss a topic such as zoophilia.

This has to be a trap, the background pitcher has a guy holding a sign showing an animal and a man having intercours crossed out with the word abuse underneath it. Regardless if it a real zoo account or not I don't want to be represented as an animal fucker