The documents do not explain the relationship between Johns and Villavicencio but Johns’ father called Villavicencio his daughter’s “boyfriend.”
Johns told deputies “Kurtz was interested in her having sex with animals” and requested photos. On Villavicencio’s phone deputies recovered photos and video of Johns having sex with her two dogs on separate occasions, records show.
The pair is also accused of speaking about Johns having sex with a different dog, according to the Collier County Sheriff’s Office.
none of which is mentioned in the mirror.co.uk article.
Of course everything about the truth of these statements would only be speculation, but apparently she only sent pictures to someone she thought she could trust and there is no charge for animal cruelty, so that leaves the question: What happened to the original accusation of sexual battery?
30-30amator equae 1 point on 2016-03-24 04:51:58
Having read both articles, I don´t see a "different spin".
These are only my assumptions, of course, but the picture that unfolds is that of a sado-masochistic relationship, with the "animal episode" as a means of degradation. Again, it´s the stoopid porn recording habit of eejits that causes trouble. When will all of them learn that porn = evidence?
I guess the man hit the woman, she brought the police into play and he decided to get his revenge by handing out the incriminating little flics. All of that shows how degenerate and and far from real love sombunall humans are. Knee deep in fetishism, abusive not only towards themselves...
I believe the woman´s allegations of the man demanding these pictures from her, it fits into the overall picture; I still can´t figure out why so many men are into "filthy dogwhores"...that sort of degradation surely is a healthy base to place a relationship on...not!
Again, true zoophilia is held hostage by fetishism. Headlines like these are produced every week around the world. If we zoos could only distance ourselves once and for all from conduct like it is depicted in these articles, we would be a big step ahead.
zoozooz 1 point on 2016-03-24 09:08:58
Yea, speculation is fun.
30-30amator equae 1 point on 2016-03-24 09:56:10
Do you recall my comments in the Espenau case? i´m quite good at speculating, you know...
All of these "zoophilia" cases that make it into the news follow a certain pattern, haven´t you realized that yet? Almost always, these are no cases of zoophilia per se, but advanced fetishism...I´d bet my ass this is also the case here...
Rannoch2002Deer Zoo 1 point on 2016-03-26 04:44:21
I can think of a few that don't, but it does seem to be the large majority, I will grant you. I too suspect that here.
DisappointedByPeopleRaccoons 1 point on 2016-03-26 17:02:19
Thank god they charged one woman who had sex with dogs and not the 1 500 000 people who had and have sex with animals everyday. And it stays that way for some time. Then they make police state in Orwell's style.
30-30amator equae 1 point on 2016-03-27 08:26:31
Don´t know if stupid or refuses to understand the situation correctly...;)
You don´t need an Orwellian police state if you hand out evidence yourself, right? Exactly that was the case here. Once again: porn = evidence. Just don´t do porn. Never.Neither for your "friend/partner" nor your clique at your preferred bestiality flic forum.
When taken seriously, the first part of your statement equals saying "We caught one thief, but not the millions of others who steal something. Let´s just make stealing legal, right?"
Exactly such shortviewed responses are what I oppose. The world won´t turn into a place where making animal porn is "normal" and sold at your local grocery store. This will never happen, even if we start full force zoophilia lobbyism. The only thing we can hope for is something I call " state regulated zoophilia"...maybe someday when headlines like the one above won´t be produced on a weekly basis.
DisappointedByPeopleRaccoons 1 point on 2016-03-27 08:30:49
Is it necessary to be so aggressive? It was a joke.
sigh
just another subreddit where I don't belong. Let's unsubscribe. Bye.
zoozooz 1 point on 2016-03-27 08:59:50
Relevant username
[deleted] 1 point on 2016-03-27 05:27:02
[deleted]
30-30amator equae 0 points on 2016-03-27 08:28:46
How do you know SHE expressed her sexuality and weren´t forced/coerced into it by her boyfriend?
/r/zoophilia archive
Interesting how different news sites give this a different spin.
For example this one: http://www.winknews.com/2016/03/22/naples-woman-allegedly-had-sex-with-pets/
none of which is mentioned in the mirror.co.uk article.
Of course everything about the truth of these statements would only be speculation, but apparently she only sent pictures to someone she thought she could trust and there is no charge for animal cruelty, so that leaves the question: What happened to the original accusation of sexual battery?
Having read both articles, I don´t see a "different spin". These are only my assumptions, of course, but the picture that unfolds is that of a sado-masochistic relationship, with the "animal episode" as a means of degradation. Again, it´s the stoopid porn recording habit of eejits that causes trouble. When will all of them learn that porn = evidence? I guess the man hit the woman, she brought the police into play and he decided to get his revenge by handing out the incriminating little flics. All of that shows how degenerate and and far from real love sombunall humans are. Knee deep in fetishism, abusive not only towards themselves... I believe the woman´s allegations of the man demanding these pictures from her, it fits into the overall picture; I still can´t figure out why so many men are into "filthy dogwhores"...that sort of degradation surely is a healthy base to place a relationship on...not!
Again, true zoophilia is held hostage by fetishism. Headlines like these are produced every week around the world. If we zoos could only distance ourselves once and for all from conduct like it is depicted in these articles, we would be a big step ahead.
Yea, speculation is fun.
Do you recall my comments in the Espenau case? i´m quite good at speculating, you know... All of these "zoophilia" cases that make it into the news follow a certain pattern, haven´t you realized that yet? Almost always, these are no cases of zoophilia per se, but advanced fetishism...I´d bet my ass this is also the case here...
I can think of a few that don't, but it does seem to be the large majority, I will grant you. I too suspect that here.
Thank god they charged one woman who had sex with dogs and not the 1 500 000 people who had and have sex with animals everyday. And it stays that way for some time. Then they make police state in Orwell's style.
Don´t know if stupid or refuses to understand the situation correctly...;) You don´t need an Orwellian police state if you hand out evidence yourself, right? Exactly that was the case here. Once again: porn = evidence. Just don´t do porn. Never.Neither for your "friend/partner" nor your clique at your preferred bestiality flic forum. When taken seriously, the first part of your statement equals saying "We caught one thief, but not the millions of others who steal something. Let´s just make stealing legal, right?"
Exactly such shortviewed responses are what I oppose. The world won´t turn into a place where making animal porn is "normal" and sold at your local grocery store. This will never happen, even if we start full force zoophilia lobbyism. The only thing we can hope for is something I call " state regulated zoophilia"...maybe someday when headlines like the one above won´t be produced on a weekly basis.
Is it necessary to be so aggressive? It was a joke.
sigh
just another subreddit where I don't belong. Let's unsubscribe. Bye.
Relevant username
[deleted]
How do you know SHE expressed her sexuality and weren´t forced/coerced into it by her boyfriend?
[deleted]