her job as the Texas state director for the Humane Society of the U.S.
Of course.
I want to know: Do they really not know that there are many absolutely nonviolent zoophiles? But it's basically impossible for them to be this uneducated after working on it for such a long time, no?
According to media reports, Arthur Lovell publicly stabbed his dog to death on March 10 at the mechanic shop where he worked.
His coworkers said they were not surprised when Lovell confessed to sexually assaulting his dogs based on how they had seen him touch his dogs in the past, but none of them intervened because they were afraid of him. They saw him cut someone with a knife after he questioned how Lovell touched his dog.
Jarl said the case highlights the correlation between violence against animals and humans in addition to the need for a bestiality statute in Texas.
Of course they say that, but why? Do they truly believe that zoophilia is a predictor of this behavior? Based on what? I really struggle with this question because I want to believe that seemingly intelligent people wouldn't say things that stupid, but here we are..
Milligan said she would like a law that allows her to prosecute bestiality happening in private using the kind of documentation that she currently can't use in court, such as videos or eye witness testimony.
Because eye witness testimony is so reliable, right. Because when certain people testify to have seen a zoophile "abuse" an animal, that will be so objective.
In her travels around the state to train prosecutors in animal cruelty prosecution, Milligan said district attorneys express more interest in prosecution once they learn about the link between violence against animals and humans.
With the problems that I still don't see any of those people being able to differentiate between animal abuse and "bestiality" which they don't define.
autotldr 2 points on 2016-05-25 19:14:48
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)
Jarl said the case highlights the correlation between violence against animals and humans in addition to the need for a bestiality statute in Texas.
Because the Texas legislature only meets every two years, Jarl said she has started working with legislators to draft language that will hopefully result in presenting a bestiality ban in 2017.
In her travels around the state to train prosecutors in animal cruelty prosecution, Milligan said district attorneys express more interest in prosecution once they learn about the link between violence against animals and humans.
/r/zoophilia archive
Of course.
I want to know: Do they really not know that there are many absolutely nonviolent zoophiles? But it's basically impossible for them to be this uneducated after working on it for such a long time, no?
Of course they say that, but why? Do they truly believe that zoophilia is a predictor of this behavior? Based on what? I really struggle with this question because I want to believe that seemingly intelligent people wouldn't say things that stupid, but here we are..
Because eye witness testimony is so reliable, right. Because when certain people testify to have seen a zoophile "abuse" an animal, that will be so objective.
With the problems that I still don't see any of those people being able to differentiate between animal abuse and "bestiality" which they don't define.
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 92%. (I'm a bot)
Extended Summary | FAQ | Theory | Feedback | Top keywords: animal^#1 bestiality^#2 Milligan^#3 law^#4 Texas^#5
Why do I waste my time reading shit like this.
Gotta love how they call it "bestiality crimes" before it's, you know, a crime.
Good media coverage here folks...
This is true
I say upvote this, get it know, and maybe finally protest against ignorance of our situations.