A silly "Shower Thought" of mine today: Exclusive Zoophilia is just an abnormally strong aversion to incest. (self.zoophilia)
submitted 2016-11-03 22:46:48 by Swibblestein
Some people seem to lack any aversion to incest. Some people have a somewhat stronger aversion, and don't find people in their immediate family attractive. Some don't find anyone in their extended family attractive.
Exclusive Zoophiles are the same... Just, using the taxonomic definition for family.
ha
I think I'm like one step below this: I can like humans, but generally not ones too similar to my WASPy family.
So I guess asexuals have an even stronger aversion to incest and refuse to do it with anything they have any possibility of being related to.
Also what about zoo's attracted to chimpanzees or gorillas which I'm sure exist.
For one, this was a silly shower thought. It's not meant to be taken so seriously.
I wasn't trying to take it seriously I was just replying with some silly thoughts of my own.
Ah, fair. I thought... Nevermind. Sometimes the intent behind a message is difficult to figure out - I misinterpreted yours, and I apologize for that.
[deleted]
I'd say I break your hypothesis. Attraction to sister and cousin, yet I'm zoo at the moment. I actually don't even have strong sexual attractions to randoms, need to bond with them first. I have trouble getting aroused when getting a happy ending as a massage parlour. Wouldn't say I'm a sexually charged person, maybe jack off on average once every two days or so. If that. And that's mainly to help me sleep
Well I did specify "exclusive zoophiles".
This self-post made my day.
Of course, if you think about it too seriously, you break it apart, but who in his right mind overthinks these things so much?
This board often has mostly "heavy" topics, it seems. I figured maybe some fun things would be in order sometimes.
[deleted]
My brother is an animal, so technically having sex with him would still be zoophillia and incest
I can understand what you're fundamentally saying here.
I've been attracted to dogs for a very long time, and I've gotten myself a pet dog recently. However, after watching him growing up from a puppy, it makes me feel really uneasy to even considering doing any sexual with him. Yet, I do not have this mental barrier at all with other dogs that are not mine.
I don't get the logic behind any of that.
It's mostly a joke. I think you're looking at it too seriously.
Most people aren't attracted to members of their family. But family also has a taxonomic definition, which, for humans, would be Hominidae. In that sense, exclusive zoophiles are the only ones who aren't attracted to members of their family.
It's a pun.
But isn't zoophilia a sexual attraction to animals, rather than an aversion to sex wth humans?
Edit: I'm an idiot and didn't realise OP specified w/ "Exclusive" zoophile.
That's why I specified "exclusive zoophilia". An exclusive zoophile (zoo-exclusive) is someone who is attracted to animals but not humans.
I see where you are coming from. I'm not sure if I am exclusive or not, I at least don't find myself wanting anything romantic or sexual with any human and I don't think I ever will - I consider myself a gray-a/demi/cupiosexual and romantic with humans which basically means I do fantasize about certain sexual/romantic situations involving humans that do include consanguineous relationships.
Very interesting. I'm zoo exclusive and you know, I think the feeling of aversion I have toward family is identical to the aversion I have toward human sex, other than its stronger with family. It'd be pretty hard to know for sure if you're right. It could also just be that the 'avoid the different' behavior that causes racial and cultural flocking is flipped in me.