Maybe this would have been better under /r/animalromance or /r/tailbait ?
actuallynotazoophileok, I lied 4 points on 2017-01-03 21:05:49
proof that animals love us. chekmate, normies.
30-30amator equae 5 points on 2017-01-04 09:43:22
Meant ironically?
The pinched back ears and tail activity tell different...this isn´t about love, it´s about dominance. The gelding (it´s one, trust me) seems to be conditioned like the typical male baroque horse doing a levade.
One must not assume love just because "erection"...I´ve seen stallions fighting with each other showing off their "meat"...
actuallynotazoophileok, I lied 2 points on 2017-01-04 19:48:49
yes it was very much tongue in cheek ;)
Swibblestein 2 points on 2017-01-06 05:14:42
I've never heard anyone use "normies" unironically. Actually, on that note, the same applies to "checkmate" after a single sentence like that.
WarCanineLove knows no boundaries between species or gender 1 point on 2017-01-04 17:44:38
Wait, there's humans who really believe that animals can't love us?
^^^Sorry, ^^^but ^^^what ^^^is ^^^wrong ^^^with ^^^our ^^^species?
/r/zoophilia archive
Maybe this would have been better under /r/animalromance or /r/tailbait ?
proof that animals love us. chekmate, normies.
Meant ironically? The pinched back ears and tail activity tell different...this isn´t about love, it´s about dominance. The gelding (it´s one, trust me) seems to be conditioned like the typical male baroque horse doing a levade.
One must not assume love just because "erection"...I´ve seen stallions fighting with each other showing off their "meat"...
yes it was very much tongue in cheek ;)
I've never heard anyone use "normies" unironically. Actually, on that note, the same applies to "checkmate" after a single sentence like that.
Wait, there's humans who really believe that animals can't love us?
^^^Sorry, ^^^but ^^^what ^^^is ^^^wrong ^^^with ^^^our ^^^species?
awesome fine!