Personifying or projecting emotions onto an animal is generally not a good idea when you're trying to interact with them in a mutually safe and enjoyable way.
haleykohr 8 points on 2017-05-29 05:06:27
Holy hell that sounds hot. Please update in your future endeavors! We need more access to the countryside for this!
[deleted] 1 point on 2017-05-29 05:50:19
[deleted]
[deleted] 5 points on 2017-05-29 05:50:54
[deleted]
NoahStark 3 points on 2017-05-29 16:25:22
I do wanna try a stalion cock but never get a chance
Battlecropscat kisser extraordinaire 5 points on 2017-05-29 20:11:25
This doesn't seem appropriate for this sub. It's not straight up pornography, sex discussions are allowed, but it still doesn't seem to sit right? Maybe because the way you described it sounds very objectifying and fetishy, not sure if that was your intention but this sub is about the romantic attraction to animals which your wording ("interested in sex with horses and horse genitals","if you have any other similar experiences with horsecock") does not seem to imply.
OrcanTahoe 2 points on 2017-05-29 22:38:02
r/animalromance is only about romantic attraction (and there's almost no one on it, to my great despair), so I think it's okay to use r/zoophilia for everything around.. zoophilia, from romance to sex.
It is a great subreddit. I don't mind how small it is, though. Makes it easy to moderate.
zootrashcandoggy doodle dandy 3 points on 2017-05-30 04:04:02
Yeah, that's my gut reaction too. If r/sexwithhorses hosted discussion this would go there.
LateossWuz gud 1 point on 2017-05-30 08:33:40
I agree with this quite a bit... This post would be better in r/sexwithhorses
I would like to point out how many upvotes this post has compared to other recent posts. I understand that not everyone here wants to get involved in a dragged out discussion like some other threads, but like come on. If threads like these are all people are looking for when they come to r/zoophilia, they should consider looking elsewhere...
Battlecropscat kisser extraordinaire 3 points on 2017-05-30 09:46:19
Or hell, even just r/bestiality.
Yeah the upvote count is really disappointing :/
StarliteMagnificentHorse Nut 1 point on 2017-05-30 13:18:58
Yeah, the upvote counts sorta says that zoophilia is just a fancy name for bestiality anymore. So sad.
AmoreBestiaPro-zoophile, non-zoophile. 1 point on 2017-05-30 12:43:10
I've been mulling this one over for a while, and I wouldn't be against a removal, personally. It's erring on the pornographic and there are indeed subreddits that are more or less designed for these kinds of posts. I'll leave you with executive power on this one, though.
Battlecropscat kisser extraordinaire 1 point on 2017-05-31 07:56:50
Well, guess they removed it for whatever reason.
For the record I don't think sex with animals without romantic attraction is bad or anything. It's just sex. As long as you communicate well with the animal and no one is hurt I have no issues with it. Their tone and post just didn't seem to fit here very well since it was basically porn.
/r/zoophilia archive
[deleted]
Personifying or projecting emotions onto an animal is generally not a good idea when you're trying to interact with them in a mutually safe and enjoyable way.
Holy hell that sounds hot. Please update in your future endeavors! We need more access to the countryside for this!
[deleted]
[deleted]
I do wanna try a stalion cock but never get a chance
This doesn't seem appropriate for this sub. It's not straight up pornography, sex discussions are allowed, but it still doesn't seem to sit right? Maybe because the way you described it sounds very objectifying and fetishy, not sure if that was your intention but this sub is about the romantic attraction to animals which your wording ("interested in sex with horses and horse genitals","if you have any other similar experiences with horsecock") does not seem to imply.
r/animalromance is only about romantic attraction (and there's almost no one on it, to my great despair), so I think it's okay to use r/zoophilia for everything around.. zoophilia, from romance to sex.
Here's a sneak peek of /r/animalromance [NSFW] using the top posts of the year!
\#1: 20 minutes into peanut butter and chill and she gives you this look | 9 comments
\#2: Cuddling an early morning | 0 comments
\#3: a beautiful couple | 11 comments
^I'm ^a ^bot, ^beep ^boop ^^| ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^^| ^Contact ^me ^^| ^Info ^^| ^Opt-out
It is a great subreddit. I don't mind how small it is, though. Makes it easy to moderate.
Yeah, that's my gut reaction too. If r/sexwithhorses hosted discussion this would go there.
I agree with this quite a bit... This post would be better in r/sexwithhorses
I would like to point out how many upvotes this post has compared to other recent posts. I understand that not everyone here wants to get involved in a dragged out discussion like some other threads, but like come on. If threads like these are all people are looking for when they come to r/zoophilia, they should consider looking elsewhere...
Or hell, even just r/bestiality.
Yeah the upvote count is really disappointing :/
Yeah, the upvote counts sorta says that zoophilia is just a fancy name for bestiality anymore. So sad.
I've been mulling this one over for a while, and I wouldn't be against a removal, personally. It's erring on the pornographic and there are indeed subreddits that are more or less designed for these kinds of posts. I'll leave you with executive power on this one, though.
Well, guess they removed it for whatever reason.
For the record I don't think sex with animals without romantic attraction is bad or anything. It's just sex. As long as you communicate well with the animal and no one is hurt I have no issues with it. Their tone and post just didn't seem to fit here very well since it was basically porn.
Congrats my friend, good on ya'
http://imgur.com/gallery/8HhL3M5
This screams fetish seeking fencehopper.