I appreciate telling me info I already knew. I didn't think I had to clarify exactly what content I was putting in each sub, when the rules are clearly defined in the sidebars
LateossWuz gud 3 points on 2017-08-20 07:02:53
This isnt really the place to ask this question, but in order to promote educating proper safety I will comment anyways. I guess this post technically doesnt break the rules of the sub though...
Make sure to recognize the difference between the legality of sex with animals and distributing videos of sex with animals, they are two different things. Just make sure to double check the laws in your location. Remember, if you are unsure about the safety of doing something, just dont do it.
The best way to avoid social drama is by using a throwaway account, takes a few seconds to create, and can save you from a lifetime of internet misery. A VPN logically wont help you unless you use it every single time you login on reddit without exception, since your ip will be checked on every login without exception as well. For purposes surrounding crime, reddit can and will surrender your ip address to authorities if it is deemed necessary. Of course very rarely do authorities ever bother putting in that kind of effort to catch someone on the internet. Generally you see people get arrested for distributing porn when they are less careful, and do in fact have faces or locations easily matchable, or have otherwise mentioned their location on the same account at some point in time.
If you want to be 100% safe then your best option is to not post anything at all. Is public distribution of masturbation material really worth a fine or years in jail?
Battlecropscat kisser extraordinaire 2 points on 2017-08-21 01:55:12
Is public distribution of masturbation material really worth a fine or years in jail?
And the very likely seizure and euthanasia of any animals involved? There has been at least one case where dogs were identified by their fur/markings alone, and taken away from the owner who posted the pornography. Unless it's a VERY up close shot, you're seriously risking the life of any animals in your photos/videos, and to me personally that never seems worth it.
caikgoch 3 points on 2017-08-20 20:01:34
Just think very carefully about this: A few years ago a particularly blatant pedo was caught. He had posted many images of himself online using editing tools to scramble the part of the picture containing his face. After more than a decade tech advanced to the point that his early postings could be unscrambled, yielding a perfect view of his face.
Safe today does not always mean safe tomorrow. That is the nature of tech.
satchelofatoms 5 points on 2017-08-21 05:47:53
I presume you mean the swirl face guy?
It's fairly obvious that that kind of transform is reversible to anyone who has played with an image editor with such a feature. It simply took some developments until that became feasible.
The lesson there is "Don't be fancy. Use simple, straightforward, and known-robust methods of censoring things.". i.e. Just black it out. Black is black, that information is gone, and there's no way you're going to recover anything from that no matter how much processing power or fancy algorithms you throw at it, as evidenced by the fact it's the prefered method of redaction by basically every inteligence and police agency in the world.
caikgoch 1 point on 2017-08-21 11:59:46
The details of the tech are unimportant. Right now files from cell phones and other "digital assistants" are poring into databases. Think Google Search on steroids. If that isn't enough, people are rushing to put everything about the world on social media. Sounds (voices) and images will searched and something that someone else "uploaded" will match. The rest is obvious.
fuzzyfurry 3 points on 2017-08-21 17:37:37
I think it was just some convolution. Reversing convolution is really basic, you learn that in basic imaging lectures. It's only not trivial to guess the original convolution kernel, but of course there are some methods to do it.
Still, to make sure you're not identifiable by three letter agencies, you have to censor your whole image. With increasing abilities in machine learning, everything in your image can be used to identify you, if there are other images of you online. Think almost invisible scratches or stains on your furniture, floor, or whatever, and yes, of course fur patterns.
Have you ever seen high res images or videos of people jacking off their animals? Look closely at their fingers. Think reconstructing fingerprints. This is not science fiction.
TokenHorseGuy 2 points on 2017-08-20 21:32:02
I think the point some people are getting at is: Why not ask that question on a sub where you DO plan to put the content? Since they would probably be more familiar with how to do it right, vs. a sub where it is specifically prohibited by Rule #1.
30-30amator equae 2 points on 2017-08-20 21:54:03
THG has a point...why don´t you ask the BF crowd as they´re way more "experienced" with publishing animal porn?
Swibblestein 1 point on 2017-08-20 22:58:37
I've wondered this for a while... Why do you use ´ (accute accent) rather than ' (apostrophe) as an apostrophe?
they´re
they're
30-30amator equae 2 points on 2017-08-20 23:12:47
German keyboard layout...simple as that. I can type a ´ without using the shift key, but I need the shift key to get a ' .
30-30amator equae 1 point on 2017-08-20 21:34:43
Seems as if you´ve already made your decision to publish your "nice and juicy stuff". Fact is: you can try and minimise the risk with VPN, deleting exif data from pictures and whatnot, but you won´t be able to exclude the risk of getting in trouble completely.
There are many examples of "cautious zoos" who still got their asses whipped...if you want to be the next one in this long line of "Ohh, I thought of EVERYTHING and they won´t get me!" folks, fine with me.
But don´t complain once your testicles are in the hands of authorities for your porn.You do it, then it´s all your responsibilty when bad stuff happens. You know the risks. There are "zoos" who have been identified by such simple things as specific fur patterns of their animals and there are folks who got into trouble because their neighbor was browsing anti sites and incidentally recognised the animal or the surroundings.
No matter how much you try to be on the safe side, publishing animal pornography isn´t a heroic deed or a nice gesture to our community, but handing out evidence to authorities. End of line. It could go well, it could go terribly wrong...and all of that just for your egotistical thrill and as another kotau to the international community of wanking pervos. As if there wasn´t enough of these incredibly detrimental smut videos out there already...
Hotdogzew-Fiel 2 points on 2017-08-22 03:51:41
Yea, I'm just going to follow everyone's advice and not create any digital recordings of anything I may or may not be doing. I won't post anything . It's like you said, there's plenty of content out there. I wasnt only going to post the stuff for the thrill, but mostly just to add content on reddit. Plus the most reason I wanted to make this post was to get exactly this kind of information . Thanks anyway
canicule_ 1 point on 2017-08-21 04:43:51
I doxxed half a dozen zoos just for fun over the years, and generally the biggest and most critical mistake people do is keeping the same username across sites. So, tip number 1: don't do that. But going through your posts you seem to already know as much, which is good.
I do however live somewhere where it's totally legal. However posting content online seems to be the legal line.
Tip number 2: any information about you is gold for someone trying to find you. Do you know how much you've narrowed down the possibility of where you are on the globe just with this statement?
Way ahead of you I am black as fuck
Oh. And you're black too.
So is my dog
And so is your dog...
Unless you are lying. In that case, continue to do just that.
Other than that, I tend to agree with what is said above. The best way not to get caught is to not post anything. And not only that, but not even recording these things in the first place. Keep in mind that the photos/videos you take will also be saved on digital storage and even if you delete them, they can still remain in memory and be recoverable with specialised software. So if you are ever suspected of being a zoo and get your computers seized, you run a very real risk. Only ever store that sort of stuff on drives you could readily "nuke" if there is ever a need. Most zoos who get caught, barring those who are caught red handed, are caught because the authorities found photographic evidence of their crimes on their computer.
Hotdogzew-Fiel 1 point on 2017-08-22 03:53:10
I may or may not be already injecting fake information. It is a good idea and I might have lied (or didnt) about specific identifiers.
Anyways aside from that I've taken everyone's advice advice will not be postinf. I'll just enjoy the incredible amount of content that's already out there.
/r/zoophilia archive
This sub is for discussion of zoophilia. The very first rule on the sidebar is "No posting pornography".
A number of people in this sub don't even approve of zoo pornography, and it would be fair to count me among them.
Allow me to clarify. Of course I'm not going to post it to this sub. I'm talking about the subs in this community.
/r/sexwithdogs /r/beastgw /r/picaofcaninedicks /r/animalromance Mostly.
r/AnimalRomance is also not for porn.
Here's a sneak peek of /r/animalromance [NSFW] using the top posts of the year!
\#1: Probably the sexiest fox I have ever seen. This is just abnormal. | 6 comments
\#2: The only mark you should ever leave on a dog | 7 comments
\#3: Fall Has Come (and so have I) | 11 comments
^I'm ^a ^bot, ^beep ^boop ^^| ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^^| ^Contact ^me ^^| ^Info ^^| ^Opt-out
I appreciate telling me info I already knew. I didn't think I had to clarify exactly what content I was putting in each sub, when the rules are clearly defined in the sidebars
This isnt really the place to ask this question, but in order to promote educating proper safety I will comment anyways. I guess this post technically doesnt break the rules of the sub though...
Make sure to recognize the difference between the legality of sex with animals and distributing videos of sex with animals, they are two different things. Just make sure to double check the laws in your location. Remember, if you are unsure about the safety of doing something, just dont do it.
The best way to avoid social drama is by using a throwaway account, takes a few seconds to create, and can save you from a lifetime of internet misery. A VPN logically wont help you unless you use it every single time you login on reddit without exception, since your ip will be checked on every login without exception as well. For purposes surrounding crime, reddit can and will surrender your ip address to authorities if it is deemed necessary. Of course very rarely do authorities ever bother putting in that kind of effort to catch someone on the internet. Generally you see people get arrested for distributing porn when they are less careful, and do in fact have faces or locations easily matchable, or have otherwise mentioned their location on the same account at some point in time.
If you want to be 100% safe then your best option is to not post anything at all. Is public distribution of masturbation material really worth a fine or years in jail?
And the very likely seizure and euthanasia of any animals involved? There has been at least one case where dogs were identified by their fur/markings alone, and taken away from the owner who posted the pornography. Unless it's a VERY up close shot, you're seriously risking the life of any animals in your photos/videos, and to me personally that never seems worth it.
Just think very carefully about this: A few years ago a particularly blatant pedo was caught. He had posted many images of himself online using editing tools to scramble the part of the picture containing his face. After more than a decade tech advanced to the point that his early postings could be unscrambled, yielding a perfect view of his face.
Safe today does not always mean safe tomorrow. That is the nature of tech.
I presume you mean the swirl face guy?
It's fairly obvious that that kind of transform is reversible to anyone who has played with an image editor with such a feature. It simply took some developments until that became feasible.
The lesson there is "Don't be fancy. Use simple, straightforward, and known-robust methods of censoring things.". i.e. Just black it out. Black is black, that information is gone, and there's no way you're going to recover anything from that no matter how much processing power or fancy algorithms you throw at it, as evidenced by the fact it's the prefered method of redaction by basically every inteligence and police agency in the world.
The details of the tech are unimportant. Right now files from cell phones and other "digital assistants" are poring into databases. Think Google Search on steroids. If that isn't enough, people are rushing to put everything about the world on social media. Sounds (voices) and images will searched and something that someone else "uploaded" will match. The rest is obvious.
I think it was just some convolution. Reversing convolution is really basic, you learn that in basic imaging lectures. It's only not trivial to guess the original convolution kernel, but of course there are some methods to do it.
Still, to make sure you're not identifiable by three letter agencies, you have to censor your whole image. With increasing abilities in machine learning, everything in your image can be used to identify you, if there are other images of you online. Think almost invisible scratches or stains on your furniture, floor, or whatever, and yes, of course fur patterns.
Have you ever seen high res images or videos of people jacking off their animals? Look closely at their fingers. Think reconstructing fingerprints. This is not science fiction.
I think the point some people are getting at is: Why not ask that question on a sub where you DO plan to put the content? Since they would probably be more familiar with how to do it right, vs. a sub where it is specifically prohibited by Rule #1.
THG has a point...why don´t you ask the BF crowd as they´re way more "experienced" with publishing animal porn?
I've wondered this for a while... Why do you use ´ (accute accent) rather than ' (apostrophe) as an apostrophe?
they´re
they're
German keyboard layout...simple as that. I can type a ´ without using the shift key, but I need the shift key to get a ' .
Seems as if you´ve already made your decision to publish your "nice and juicy stuff". Fact is: you can try and minimise the risk with VPN, deleting exif data from pictures and whatnot, but you won´t be able to exclude the risk of getting in trouble completely. There are many examples of "cautious zoos" who still got their asses whipped...if you want to be the next one in this long line of "Ohh, I thought of EVERYTHING and they won´t get me!" folks, fine with me.
But don´t complain once your testicles are in the hands of authorities for your porn.You do it, then it´s all your responsibilty when bad stuff happens. You know the risks. There are "zoos" who have been identified by such simple things as specific fur patterns of their animals and there are folks who got into trouble because their neighbor was browsing anti sites and incidentally recognised the animal or the surroundings.
No matter how much you try to be on the safe side, publishing animal pornography isn´t a heroic deed or a nice gesture to our community, but handing out evidence to authorities. End of line. It could go well, it could go terribly wrong...and all of that just for your egotistical thrill and as another kotau to the international community of wanking pervos. As if there wasn´t enough of these incredibly detrimental smut videos out there already...
Yea, I'm just going to follow everyone's advice and not create any digital recordings of anything I may or may not be doing. I won't post anything . It's like you said, there's plenty of content out there. I wasnt only going to post the stuff for the thrill, but mostly just to add content on reddit. Plus the most reason I wanted to make this post was to get exactly this kind of information . Thanks anyway
I doxxed half a dozen zoos just for fun over the years, and generally the biggest and most critical mistake people do is keeping the same username across sites. So, tip number 1: don't do that. But going through your posts you seem to already know as much, which is good.
Tip number 2: any information about you is gold for someone trying to find you. Do you know how much you've narrowed down the possibility of where you are on the globe just with this statement?
Oh. And you're black too.
And so is your dog...
Unless you are lying. In that case, continue to do just that.
Other than that, I tend to agree with what is said above. The best way not to get caught is to not post anything. And not only that, but not even recording these things in the first place. Keep in mind that the photos/videos you take will also be saved on digital storage and even if you delete them, they can still remain in memory and be recoverable with specialised software. So if you are ever suspected of being a zoo and get your computers seized, you run a very real risk. Only ever store that sort of stuff on drives you could readily "nuke" if there is ever a need. Most zoos who get caught, barring those who are caught red handed, are caught because the authorities found photographic evidence of their crimes on their computer.
I may or may not be already injecting fake information. It is a good idea and I might have lied (or didnt) about specific identifiers.
Anyways aside from that I've taken everyone's advice advice will not be postinf. I'll just enjoy the incredible amount of content that's already out there.
don't