30-30amator equae -2 points on 2017-09-18 23:14:28
One question: how old are you,OP? This does not even reach MAD magazine levels...gosh...
soldierboy2bDoggo 1 point on 2017-09-19 05:47:38
I don't want to tell. :)
SCP_2547 3 points on 2017-09-19 05:28:45
The posts in this sub are starting to make me cringe.
Not spreading my hate, but ughh... I hate to imagine if zoophilia was more common and we got many parodies of such things.
JTRHNBR, zoo parodies, zoo CAH, "zoo" memes, anything zoo... I don't know, but we seem worse than furries and bronies with the cringe. Makes me think even more that they're subtypes of us.
soldierboy2bDoggo 2 points on 2017-09-19 05:46:06
I personally like the idea of zoophilia being more common, parodies of zoo-related things would be inevitable.
But I can't say much because I like a lot of zoo-related memes, and I'm a furry, and a brony.
30-30amator equae 1 point on 2017-09-19 06:50:12
I totally agree, to many this zoophilia thing seems to be more of a "fandom" rather than a genuine orientation.
SCP_2547 0 points on 2017-09-19 10:04:34
I have fucking idea what you're saying because of your grammar. No kidding.
The lack of a wall of text also makes me suspicious...
AmoreBestiaPro-zoophile, non-zoophile. 2 points on 2017-09-19 16:53:55
English native here, the grammar seems fine to me, though the flow of the sentence is a little strange. Can you describe how it reads for you?
(on the note of grammar your proper use of you're and your in the same sentence is mildly satisfying)
SCP_2547 2 points on 2017-09-19 17:05:44
English native here, the grammar seems fine to me, though the flow of the sentence is a little strange. Can you describe how it reads for you?
I just realized, I read it very wrong.
''to many this zoophilia thing'' is what really confused me.
But now I realized what it meant. I didn't know that he meant ''many'' as in, individuals. I also thought ''to'' meant ''too''.
(on the note of grammar your proper use of you're and your in the same sentence is mildly satisfying)
I get annoyed very often by this, as it's a very common mistake.
Same goes for ''their'', ''they're'' and ''there'' too. There's other mistakes like these ones, I just can't think of them right now. They're at the tip of my tongue somewhere...
EDIT: Oh, like I mentioned earlier in this message... ''to'' and ''too''.
Also, did you notice that before I edited my comment I spelt ''grammar'' as ''grammer''? You didn't point it out, which I thought was weird.
I didn't make the mistake before and I honestly don't know how I missed it...
AmoreBestiaPro-zoophile, non-zoophile. 1 point on 2017-09-19 17:25:12
''to many this zoophilia thing'' is what really confused me.
Yeah, that part is a bit awkward for some reason.
Also, did you notice that before I edited my comment I spelt ''grammar'' as ''grammer''? You didn't point it out, which I thought was weird.
I noticed it, but a mistake like that is barely worth mentioning. I find correct use of word forms to be more satisfying than correct spelling, and... I find spelling grammar as grammer to be kind of funny, frankly. It's such a subtle yet blatant contradiction especially since it's almost always relevant to the topic at hand. I think I've done it a couple times myself when I was really tired. It always gets a giggle out of me, though.
30-30amator equae 1 point on 2017-09-20 04:44:20
So it is now obligatory for me to write walls of text? ;)
My main reason to keep it short: several freshly harvested and dried strains of automatic flowering hemp plants that have to be tested for their potency and effect ;) Bought some cheap Auto seeds from Bulk Seed Bank this spring and their Northern Lights Auto is da bomb.
Maybe I should have inserted a comma after the first two words of my sentence..."to many, this zoophilia thing..." Clearer now?
soldierboy2bDoggo 2 points on 2017-09-19 14:16:06
I guess what I'm saying is, there are some gay CAH cards, there's gay memes, there's some gay parodies. But, homosexuality in a sexual orientation.
I think that parodies of zoosexuality are inevitable, just like parodies of other sexualities are inevitable.
/r/zoophilia archive
This song goes perfectly with this shirt. https://iheartdogs.com/product/i-kissed-a-dog/
One question: how old are you,OP? This does not even reach MAD magazine levels...gosh...
I don't want to tell. :)
The posts in this sub are starting to make me cringe.
Not spreading my hate, but ughh... I hate to imagine if zoophilia was more common and we got many parodies of such things.
JTRHNBR, zoo parodies, zoo CAH, "zoo" memes, anything zoo... I don't know, but we seem worse than furries and bronies with the cringe. Makes me think even more that they're subtypes of us.
I personally like the idea of zoophilia being more common, parodies of zoo-related things would be inevitable.
But I can't say much because I like a lot of zoo-related memes, and I'm a furry, and a brony.
I totally agree, to many this zoophilia thing seems to be more of a "fandom" rather than a genuine orientation.
I have fucking idea what you're saying because of your grammar. No kidding.
The lack of a wall of text also makes me suspicious...
English native here, the grammar seems fine to me, though the flow of the sentence is a little strange. Can you describe how it reads for you?
(on the note of grammar your proper use of you're and your in the same sentence is mildly satisfying)
I just realized, I read it very wrong.
''to many this zoophilia thing'' is what really confused me.
But now I realized what it meant. I didn't know that he meant ''many'' as in, individuals. I also thought ''to'' meant ''too''.
I get annoyed very often by this, as it's a very common mistake.
Same goes for ''their'', ''they're'' and ''there'' too. There's other mistakes like these ones, I just can't think of them right now. They're at the tip of my tongue somewhere...
EDIT: Oh, like I mentioned earlier in this message... ''to'' and ''too''.
Also, did you notice that before I edited my comment I spelt ''grammar'' as ''grammer''? You didn't point it out, which I thought was weird.
I didn't make the mistake before and I honestly don't know how I missed it...
Yeah, that part is a bit awkward for some reason.
I noticed it, but a mistake like that is barely worth mentioning. I find correct use of word forms to be more satisfying than correct spelling, and... I find spelling grammar as grammer to be kind of funny, frankly. It's such a subtle yet blatant contradiction especially since it's almost always relevant to the topic at hand. I think I've done it a couple times myself when I was really tired. It always gets a giggle out of me, though.
So it is now obligatory for me to write walls of text? ;)
My main reason to keep it short: several freshly harvested and dried strains of automatic flowering hemp plants that have to be tested for their potency and effect ;) Bought some cheap Auto seeds from Bulk Seed Bank this spring and their Northern Lights Auto is da bomb.
Maybe I should have inserted a comma after the first two words of my sentence..."to many, this zoophilia thing..." Clearer now?
I guess what I'm saying is, there are some gay CAH cards, there's gay memes, there's some gay parodies. But, homosexuality in a sexual orientation.
I think that parodies of zoosexuality are inevitable, just like parodies of other sexualities are inevitable.