[some salt is ok] this place is dead again so here's a question i guess. (self.zoophilia)
submitted 2017-07-29 02:40:31 by thelongestusernameee banned from the aquarium touch tank
Are there any animals that your just completely turned off by? Why?
/r/zoophilia archive
Apes. They just look and act too much like humans.
Insects, fish, certain birds. Just too foreign in their behavior and anatomy for me. Also, I fucking loathe the giant red asses of baboons.
Going to stick to mammals here to avoid having a gigantic list.
Pigs. I know some people like them, and they can make great pets, and they're intelligent and all that - plenty of good things going for them - but they are not sexy in the slightest.
Similarly, Elephants, Rhinos... Pretty much any non-aquatic mammal that is lacking hair. Oh, and humans too. I wonder if there's a connection between my distaste for humans and my distaste for those others?
Most apes, on that note.
Why hate pigs? They're fucking delicious!
The thing that's more repulsion for me than just a neutral 'not my thing' is dogs bred into painful shapes like pugs.
I was meaning to make a post about this. How is breeding these animals not classed as animal cruelty yet? Is there anything being done about it that I dont know about?
It's illegal in Germany I believe. In other countries there's been a larger push for awareness of these issues in dogs.
[deleted]
Same here. Also dogs with significant body confo faults like swaybacks, high rear or BOW LEGS I CAN'T STAND TURNED OUT ELBOWS OR COW HOCKS
Oh man I feel that so much. I've seen a dog and thought "Oh dang, he's pretty cute!" only to then look down and see horrible painful-looking legs.
It's sooo common in bull breeds especially which are my favorites.
Alright, you really wanna know:
Dogs [some salt is ok]. I dont really hate them, im just turned off by them. I dont really know why to be honest, probably because they do gross things like lick their butt n stuff.
So why is this downvoted?
Zoos love dogs I guess?
Lateoss you're right, dogs are super nasty... And some of us like that ;3
But downvoting that comment makes no sense, it's the point of this thread. Really shows how others use the voting system when their feelings are in control.
That makes me think, I had a similar thread long ago and it wasn't as popular as this one. In fact, it was even disliked: https://www.reddit.com/r/zoophilia/comments/60bmm2/what_animals_do_you_find_unattractive/
And in my opinion dogs aren't nasty. Almost everything is technically nasty.
We stick our damn mouths into genitals and anuses. And of course, more than that.
Like u/SCP_2547 said, basically everything is technically nasty when you are talking about sex.
I know horses do some pretty nasty stuff too that I dont mind at all hehe
[deleted]
Humans, apes, insects, spiders, some birds. Horses and dogs are neutral for me.
Since there was an anti dog post, I'll follow up with my opinion of horses.
How's any of that giant shit machine sexy like at all. I just don't get it. The canine form is sexy as fuck and the only thing horses got going for then I that they at least somewhat look like canids.
[deleted]
''shit machine''
Ehm, literally any animal including humans is basically that.
Oh, and that's how attraction works. You can't ''get it.''
I won't be confused nor would I judge someone for wanting to fuck a chair, a wall or a plant.
Though, the only thing I don't understand is furry attractions.
So you're attracted to anthros, but also humans and not animals? Talk about illogical...
And I wonder, why do you think dogs and horses look similar? Their bodies definitely aren't.
I'd say they may have some similar behaviors such as being loyal, very intelligent, social, lovable creatures, etc. but their bodies are quite different.
A propos fucking a chair:
In the eighties, there was a phase when ninjas in asian martial arts movies became hip, probably early eighties or mid eighties. I was totally into shitty movies like Ninja Commando and American Fighter (as a boy in his early teens, understandable, but never justifiable ;) )and one day , me and my best friend who was also a ninja enthusiast, discovered cheap "Ninja" wear in a store. We both ended up buying one of that chinese made crap, playing "Ninja" late in the evening in the totally dead and boring village we both lived in back then. First, it was childish hide-and-seek while wearing black stuff, imagining being in Edo phase Japan, but soon, we became more "curageous" (would now say "stupid" instead ;) ) , bought a grappling hook, shuko (hand claws you use to climb walls and trees) and ashiko (the same metal spiked claw for your feet) and started climbing. Our village mostly consisted of one storey buildings, the roofs were quickly accessible from the street level. So, my friend and me were doing that "Ninja" thing, sitting on a rooftop of a small building, when he suddenly poked my side, pointing in the direction of a lit window. Inside the room behind the window, a naked girl , probably around her twenties, angrily rubbed her vagina against a leg of a chair she had turned around. My friend insisted on watching the show, but I convinced him to leave...you cannot imagine our surprise when a few days later, exactly that girl walked by us in a public swimming pool... Totally off topic, but the "...wanting to fuck a chair" part just forced me to share some of my childhood traumata...;)
And you didn't confront her about it? Man, that would've been so fun to fuck around with.
Well hey, there's a story for everything. I am curious though why she would do that.
I guess she misunderstood the meaning of ''wood'' or something, I guess...
Turned off by leaves a broad mark. There are just too many, and it's too ambiguous.
For instance, I am a canine zoo, but many (read most) dog breeds turn me off, and even some individuals among the breeds I like do.
If we go instead to animals I cannot be turned on by as a group instead (sticking to domestic and more common mammals) it's easier. Most primates, though certain humans excite me; pigs; all of the rodents; most marsupials; and generally any class that isn't a canine or equine do nothing for me. I just don't find most mammals sexy.
silverwolf
I'm completely turned off by insects.
There nothing really sexual to do with them, after all.
i guarantee you someone out there has proven you wrong
Sex is an exchange between two partners.
Masturbating with insects is very possible, but it's not sex, just masturbation.
I remember years ago 'Something Awful' featured some posts from a website containing people with insect fetishes. One guy liked to let roaches crawl all over his penis.
There was also a girl on another part of the internet (blowfly girl) who inserted rancid pieces of meat covered with maggots into her vagina. I think often there's an element of degradation/being 'filthy' involved in a sexual interest in insects.
As someone who is into insects in a semi-zoo way these sorts of acts are kinda different. As you said there's degradation aspects and for some people it's more about it feeling interesting. Not as much about finding the bugs themselves sexually attractive.
Hetero equine exclusive male zoo here, so I´d say I´m only "turned on" by fullsized horse mares who fit into my ideal. Not attracted to ponies, donkey mares, Zebra mares, not attracted to overly plump mares like many draft breeds (although I slept with a Haflinger mare and with a half Haflinger, half Arabian, but the pure Haflinger lady was pretty "slim" for her breed and with the half Hafi, half arabian mare, the arabian genes came through much more than the Hafi ones...); I´m genuinely repelled by the head shape of purebred, so called Asil Arab horses with its concave side silhouette the same amount I´m repelled from the direct opposite, the ram head some Lusitanos have. The usually very slim racing horse breed mares also don´t do the trick for me, I´m pretty fixated on what you´d call a well muscled, fine shaped dressage horse mare with a good exterieur, such as Oldenburg, Hannover and Lipizzan horses.My Tinker lady does have wide hips and is quite "round", but still has enough physique of a dressage horse to make me fall in love with her.
All other animals I could not even imagine having sex and/or a relationship with...
Didn't know we had such a specific zoophile here.
I mean, even I thought I was and I'm attracted to multiple species...
In fact, that’s interesting, because before I discovered this sub, I was entirely convinced that being attracted to more than one species is the exception rather than the rule among the zoo community. From a heterosexual perspective – which I can truly identify with since I have been referring to myself as a heterosexual man for most of my life – it seems quite illogical that a considerable number of zoophiles are so unspecific in their choice of sexual partners. Hence, assuming that the same mechanisms of sexual attraction that are typical of hetero- or homosexual humans are also found in zoophile individuals , u/30-30’s approach appears to be quite natural to me, for it matches what a „normal“ heterosexual male would have responded to a similar question involving human women. Personally, I consider myself as a heterosexual man with an inexplicable attraction to female horses, meaning that my relationship with my mare is comparable to my past experiences with human partners and that I treat her with the same level of care and respect that would be appropriate when dealing with a human girlfriend. Accordingly, I’ve always considered sex to be a consensual activity that two partners engage in as an expression of deep love and affection, as something that both of them derive pleasure from, as something that goes beyond the mere stimulation of sex organs. To get to the point, I am confident to say that the outward appearance of my mare has never had any significant impact on my feelings. Rather, my sexual attraction to her stems from a deep emotional bond, a feeling of love that makes me overlook or accept her flaws and imperfections, directing my focus towards my mental image of the mare I love. Indeed, it is hard for me to find the right words to express what I want to get across, especially in a foreign language, so let me formulate it that way: Even though I’ve never had a girlfriend that even came close to Alejandra Guilmant, and even though I have to admit that my mare doesn’t stand a chance against HH Azure’s perfect body, I’ve always regarded my female partners as the most precious and wonderful thing in the world. More than just once, I miraculously fell in love with a girl or woman who was not exactly my type and with regards to my equine lover, I’d never have expected to own an Iberian horse, especially not a black one. Yet I felt like I had not other choice than to buy her and by today, I can say with pride that I´d never trade her for any warmblood mare, no matter how beautiful she might be.
Let's try a quick left turn. For me it is more about the personality than the look. I don't like submissive individuals nor do I like deceptive individuals. A stallion comes pretty close to my ideal, both proud and loyal. I have known a few dogs like that too.
A high percentage of the Zoos that I have spoken with think much the same.
Pride and loyalty, both being solely human (meta-)concepts you are imposing onto animals...what else can be more zoo than seeking human traits in animals.... /s
"If someone would cast a spell on all male animals that irreversably shrinks their penises to the size and shape of an average human male´s penis at 8´o clock the next morning, gay "zoophilia"would cease to exist at 8:01 AM"
If you only knew how your reply fits perfectly into the unfavourable picture I have of you from reading many of your comments on BF....you´re so clearly anthropomorphising animals, it´s literally not real anymore....
That's what I like about you, you're so reliable, always bringing the same irrelevant arguments to the discussion.
So I'm a terrible Zoo because I post on BF like I am right now explaining why a young fool shouldn't shove an "anatomically correct" dildo up his neighbor's mares' vagina.
RE that magic spell of yours, I haven't had a penis actually in me for years. The doctors removed that part of me and I have been keeping the critters happy with substitutes. The only thing I get out of it is the joy of giving joy.
And I am once again immeasurably sad for anyone with such an empty life. Did you know that for the rest of the world dogs set the standard for absolute loyalty? And "proud" is actually part of the breed standard for many animals. "Proud horse" is a cliche' in English (for multiple reasons).
Even ignoring the personal costs, science has been beyond the "instinct driven blackbox" model of animal behavior for years.
The most attractive dog breed in the world to me has a penis much smaller than the human average. Doesn't affect my attraction whatsoever.
Actions reflect personality. Even in humans. Sometimes it's wrong on both accounts, but it's still a useful metric.
[deleted]
And that's funny, because he's probably the most luckiest and happiest zoophile out there.
Apes, fish, reptiles, amphibians, insects...pretty much every animal without fur for me is unattractive. ALthough considering elephants have large prehensile parts, I kinda do fantasize about them sexually...but in a "ugghh your so so ugly, but that D is something I want to have inside of me" kind of way.
Fat dogs, cats, or horses. Or any animal really. But mainly because I just can't get over the fact that people don't realize what healthy weight pets are supposed to look like and let their animals become overweight.
Yep. I can understand it as an aesthetic or as a fetish, so in fantasy and art I'm fine with it, but the reality of it being a sign of bad husbandry is too sad for me to enjoy them as cute or sexy.
Bulls are just big, scary, muscly beasts to me. Cows can be quite beautiful but I also associate them with constant shitting. I'd happily pet a cow but I wouldn't try anything with them.
Apes and goats, though I really only have a strong attraction for lithe looking mares like Arabs and Thoroughbreds, and lionesses.
[deleted]
I see where you're coming from, though, after having mares for so many years I've come to find the scent of their heat intoxicating.
[deleted]
I think you have a timing problem. The blood goes by in the early stages. By the time she's in standing heat, the blood is long gone.
[deleted]
Mares who have "menstrual bleeding"? Ohhh, the "expert" is speaking...when you have any traces of blood in your mare´s urine, this is NOT menstruation!!! Chances are high your mare suffers from a kidney problem and/or shows full symptoms of what we Germans call "Kreuzverschlag" (couldn´t find a trustworthy translation of that word). Innested, but unfertilised follicles are fully resorbed by the mare and if you take a look at the anatomy of a mare´s reproductive organs, you quickly find out why mares don´t bleed "when it´s that time of the month"...not to mention how a mare´s heat and a human woman´s menstruation are completely different and only vaguely comparable even though both species are mammals.
Some "experts" even mistake a mare´s "Kotwasser" ("feces water") that drips out of the mare´s anus, runs down the labia and usually crystalises on the bottom of them for "menstruational blood" because these chrystals ususally have a reddish/brownish hue, but that only shows how much of real experts these "experts" are and how little they know about mares and their anatomy.
If you know where the exit of the urethra , the uterus and the tubes towards the ovaries and the glands that are responsible for producing the "heat slime" are located in a mare and how all of these are connected, the last thing you´ll do is claiming anything like "mare menstruation"...basically the same "quality knowledge" like saying that mares pee when the climax...stupid "zoo" folklore perpetuated by countless fools parroting it for ages.
Look, caikgoch, you never get tired of telling everyone about your "15 HH stallion" and your experiences with "your guy"...I´d say you pull this off in almost every 3rd post on BF...but in one of your replies to me, you said that you hadn´t had sex for years...although you don´t hesitate to tell your "my guy" stories like they just took place, only seconds before you post. Can you blame me for losing any trust in what you write? Even that little amount of trust I still had after all your cringeworthy posts and replies to my PMs, like saying "Why is it a problem to publish self shot porn if it helps to feed your animals?" and proposing "child marriages" by advising people to "get their dog as a puppy to imprint him onto you"...when muslims do it, it´s the end of modern civilisation, but if those "noble zoos" do it, it´s perfectly fine? U-huh...
Anyway...thank you for showing off your true colours with the statement(s) you made above. They just further assure me in my unfavourable estimation of your basic character and your real knowledge about horses....
You know, this is why I hate allowing people to delete posts after replies rave been made. It makes life too easy on trolls.
As I remember it, I was speaking to a know dog Zoo and therefor talking about a bitch's bleeding. In any case, you should have picked up on the "standing heat" and "right after bleeding" parts to realize that nothing " menstruation" was intended.
Re the other post mentioned, I said very plainly that we now use substitute methods for his pleasure. Yes, I have glossed over the fact that I have had three major surgeries and lost significant body mass to cancer. My animals are still fed and cared for and when I am able, I spend time with them even to the extent of sexually pleasuring them.
What I enjoy most about this little tirade is your public admission that you use multiple names and outright lies to gather information on people that you imagine are evil. Are you any relation to Randy?
Randy? You mean the Amazing Randi, an ex stage magician and the head of the committee for claims of the paranormal, known for debunking bullshit for decades....in this case, I cannot deny at least a somehow mental relation as I´m also not buying this zoo folklore crap of yours...
You couldn't just admit that you misread due to a lack of context?
I could...but by giving me a warning for just quoting some other user´s flair without even apologising for an "insult" that wasn´t even mine, my words, you set a rather impressive example of how to deal with errors...;) Remember, the "resident shitposter"?!? ;)
It wasn't one comment that I struck you for. It was struck as an aggregate of the posts you made in a single thread, and I said rather clearly... "I'm actually gonna strike this, which I normally wouldn't, because you just got shitty in a thread specifically about R7". The resident shitposter part was never considered in that strike. I don't know how you think we handle rule violations, but I'll tell you this right now: we have a database for disrespect strikes. When someone recieves a strike for disrespect, we list all of the comments that contributed to the strike in our enforcement database. The strike you're referencing lists three comments in the thread... almost every comment you made in that thread, essentially. I suppose it's fitting that you'd try marginalizing our discretion as moderators via oversimplification and with the hope that we wouldn't be able to bring context to the situation.
For anyone interested, here are the entries for that specific strike.
[T1(July/2/2017)][T1(July/2/2017)][T1(July/2/2017)]
[removed]
Your ";)"s aren't get out of jail free cards, and sarcasm is honestly more liable to get you a strike... Especially considering this. I don't care if you take me seriously as long as you take the rules seriously.
You just tried attacking me because I called you out, instead of even trying to defend yourself or conceding. This all started with me saying that admitting you misread wo ld be ideal. You weren't even really at fault with the first reply.
I did because I kind of regret my statement.
My thoughts are sometimes interfering with eachother and not making sense, so it's sometimes a little chaos and regret what I say.
Opinions can change very fast with the mood changes and such.
I don't like the policy but accept it as part of the price for being here.
I don't like individuals that work at misinterpreting things to feed the drama and will reply accordingly.
I find little fault with you (at least today). ;)
Not really any blood with mares.
I can't think of any dogs that turn me off. Well, pugs and their ugly face. Bullsdogs too.
Horse face is also off putting. I can see why people like horses, but the head... so ugly. Only a mom would love that face. Or an equinophile.